IP Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Allied Science

Print ISSN: 2582-4147

Online ISSN: 2582-421X

CODEN : IJOABK

IP Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Allied Science (JOAS) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2018 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the article more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 315

PDF Downloaded: 210


Get Permission Manjula and Krishna Kumar: Expert opinion on the prescription practice of antihistamines for the management of allergic rhinitis in Indian settings


Introduction

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a major public health concern, affecting 400 million subjects globally.1 Approximately 55% of the allergies diagnosed in India are classified as AR, and the associated symptoms can interfere with cognitive and emotional functioning, significantly impacting the patient's quality of life.2, 3 Decongestants, intranasal corticosteroids, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and oral/intranasal H1-antihistamines were the cornerstones of AR therapy. The increasing popularity of second-generation antihistamines could be attributed to comparable efficacy and decreased incidence of side effects as compared to their first-generation counterparts.4 Levocetirizine, a potent second-generation H1 receptor antagonist, effectively treats persistent AR, improving the quality of life and reducing comorbidities and societal costs.5 Montelukast, an extremely selective leukotriene D4 type I receptor antagonist, combines bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory properties.6

Clinical studies corroborates the synergistic effects of montelukast in conjunction with antihistamine for reducing the symptoms of AR.7, 8 Compared to levocetirizine monotherapy, concurrent treatment with montelukast improves both symptoms and the quality of life in individuals with AR.9 Additionally, the combination of fexofenadine and montelukast has been reported to have better efficacy than antihistamine drugs alone in controlling AR symptoms.10 Some studies also highlighted that there was a significant quantitative differences in the prescribing patterns of antihistamines across different countries.11 The current survey aims to gather expert opinions on the use of antihistamines alone or in various combinations for the management of AR in Indian settings.

Materials and Methods

This was a clinician’s perspectives based cross sectional study where we conducted a multiple-response questionnaire based survey among otorhinolaryngologists with experience in treating AR in the major Indian cities from June 2022 to December 2022.

Questionnaire

The questionnaire booklet named LAMINAR (Levocetirizine + Montelukast And Montelukast + FexofenadIne in the management of Allergic Rhinitis) study was sent to the otorhinolaryngologists who were interested to participate. The LAMINAR questionnaire booklet consisted of 23 questions, with the majority of them focused on the current practices, clinical observations, and experiences related to AR and the use of oral histamines for managing the disease. The study was conducted after receiving approval from Bangalore Ethics, an Independent Ethics Committee which was recognized by the Indian Regulatory Authority, Drug Controller General of India.

Participants

An invitation was sent to leading otorhinolaryngologists in managing AR in the month of March 2022 for participation in this Indian survey. About 435 allergy experts from major cities of all Indian states representing the geographical distribution shared their willingness to participate and provide necessary data. Otorhinolaryngologists were requested to complete the questionnaire without discussing with peers. A written informed consent was obtained from each allergists prior initiation of the study.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, with percentages representing categorical variables. The distribution of each variable was illustrated using both frequency and percentage distributions. Furthermore, bar charts were generated using Excel 2013 (version 16.0.13901.20400) to visually represent the data findings.

Results

Of 435 participants, 29% reported sneezing as the common symptom observed in AR, followed by congestion and running nose by 26%, and 23% of the respondents respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Response to the common symptoms observed in AR in routine practice

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/f27db692-201a-461a-aead-acb53f0b831fimage1.png

The majority of the participants (84.83%) preferred combinations of antihistamines and leukotriene receptor antagonists for the treatment of AR (Table 1). Specifically, 52% of the respondents favoured levocetirizine for AR management, while 43% preferred fexofenadine (Table 2). Approximately 63% of the respondents opted for polytherapy involving the combination of oral antihistamines and anti-leukotrienes for the management of AR. As per the survey, the most preferred antihistamine combination for AR management was levocetirizine + montelukast (46%), followed by fexofenadine + montelukast (22%).

Table 1

Response on the preferred choice of treatment for the management of AR in routine practice

Preferred choice of treatment for the management of AR

Response rate (n = 435)

Only antihistamine

9 (2.07%)

Leukotriene receptor antagonists

52 (11.95%)

Combination of antihistamine and leukotriene receptor antagonists

369 (84.83%)

Intranasal corticosteroid sprays

1 (0.23%)

Nasal spray with antihistamines

2 (0.46%)

Others

2 (0.46%)

Table 2

Response on the preferred antihistamine for the management of AR in routine practice

Preference of antihistamine for the management of AR

Response rate (n = 435)

Fexofenadine

187 (42.99%)

Levocetirizine

227 (52.18%)

Bilastine

11 (2.53%)

Ebastine

4 (0.92%)

Others

6 (1.38%)

Approximately 48% of the participants preferred the combination of levocetirizine and montelukast for treating symptoms such as AR sneezing, runny nose, itchy eyes and nose, cough, and nasal symptoms. However, 33% of the participants favoured this combination for managing AR and asthma (Figure 2). On the other hand, 39% of the respondents opted for the fexofenadine and montelukast combination to address symptoms of AR, sneezing, runny nose, itchy eyes, itchy nose, cough, and nasal symptoms. Similarly, 33% of the respondents preferred this combination for managing AR and asthma (Figure 3). It was worth noting that 51% of the respondents preferred using levocetirizine and montelukast for 1-4 weeks, while 40% of them favoured the fexofenadine and montelukast combination for the same time frame.

Figure 2

Response to the indications that require the prescription of levocetirizine + montelukast combination in routine practice

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/f27db692-201a-461a-aead-acb53f0b831fimage2.png
Figure 3

Response to the indications that require the prescription of fexofenadine + montelukast combination in routine practice

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/f27db692-201a-461a-aead-acb53f0b831fimage3.png

Among the respondents, 52% preferred the levocetirizine + montelukast combination, while 39% suggested the fexofenadine + montelukast combination for alleviating nasal congestion (Table 2). According to 60% of the participants, the use of fexofenadine + montelukast combination was effective in improving the daytime and nighttime nasal symptoms as well as daytime eye symptoms.

Table 3

Response on the medications used alone or in combination for the improvement in nasal congestion in routine practice

Medications

Response rate (n = 435)

Levocetirizine + montelukast

227 (52.18%)

Fexofenadine + montelukast

168 (38.62%)

Bilastine + montelukast

31 (7.13%)

All the above

3 (0.69%)

Deflazacort

1 (0.23%)

Intranasal corticosteroid spray

3 (0.69%)

Others

2 (0.46%)

Approximately, 64% of the participants preferred the levocetirizine + montelukast combination for the management of nighttime nasal symptoms whereas, fexofenadine + montelukast combination was preferred by 55% of the respondents for the management of daytime nasal symptoms (Table 3). Around 64% of the respondents considered the effectiveness of levocetirizine + montelukast in treating all AR symptoms as the key advantage when prescribing the drug, and 69% opted for the antihistamine + montelukast combination due to its cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, around 56% of the respondents preferred the 10-tablet package for the antihistamine + montelukast combination when prescribing to AR patients, while 30% of the respondents favoured the 15-tablet package.(Table 4)

Table 4

Response to the recommended medications for improving day and nighttime symptoms in clinical practice

Medications for improving day and night time symptoms

Response rate (n = 435)

Daytime nasal symptoms

Nighttime nasal symptoms

Levocetirizine + montelukast

159 (36.55%)

278 (63.91%)

Fexofenadine + montelukast

240 (55.17%)

121 (27.82%)

Bilastine + montelukast

29 (6.67%)

25 (5.75%)

All the above

1 (0.23%)

4 (0.92%)

Nasal corticosteroid

2 (0.46%)

0

Cetirizine + phenylephrine

0

1 (0.23%)

Not tried in children

0

1 (0.23%)

Not attempted

4 (0.92%)

5 (1.15%)

Discussion

The current survey highlights the preference and effectiveness of leukotriene receptor antagonists and antihistamine combinations for managing AR in routine clinical practice. As per the current survey, levocetirizine + montelukast was highly preferred for nighttime symptoms, possibly due to its effectiveness in promoting better sleep quality. While fexofenadine + montelukast was favoured for managing daytime symptoms, indicating its effectiveness in providing relief for daily activities. This indicated that the side effect of sedation with first generation antihistamines which perfectly suited for nighttime symptoms whereas the newer generation antihistamines taken irrespective of time because of minimal effects on sedation.12 A study conducted by Xu et al. supported these findings, suggested that selective H1-antihistamines and leukotriene receptor antagonists were both safe and effective for treating systemic AR. However, selective H1-antihistamines were better suited for managing daytime nasal symptoms, including congestion, rhinorrhea, pruritus, and sneezing. In contrast, leukotriene receptor antagonists were more effective for addressing nighttime symptoms like difficulty falling asleep, nocturnal awakenings, and nasal congestion upon awakening.13 Additionally, Liu et al. found that leukotriene receptor antagonists combined with H1-antihistamines can enhance the effectiveness of treatment against daytime nasal symptoms such as sneezing, itching, and rhinorrhea. However, this combination may not be as effective for managing nighttime nasal symptoms or ocular symptoms. These findings suggested that a combined therapy approach may be more beneficial for individuals with persistent AR.14

In the current survey, most of the respondents favoured polytherapy using the combination of oral antihistamine and oral antileukotriene for the treatment of AR, especially levocetirizine and montelukast. This preference was supported by the findings of Adsule and Misra, who reported the superiority of the levocetirizine and montelukast combination in the treatment of persistent AR compared to montelukast monotherapy alone.5 Furthermore, studies corroborated the efficacy of this combination for treating nasal symptoms of patients suffering from AR.15, 16 Importantly, the international consensus statement on allergy and rhinology also pointed out that the combination of oral antihistamine with LTRA was superior in symptom reduction and quality of life (QOL) improvement compared to placebo and to either agent as monotherapy.17 Notably, a significant proportion of current survey respondents favoured the combination of fexofenadine and montelukast for relieving daytime nasal symptoms. In contrast, the combination of levocetirizine and montelukast was favoured for the treatment of nighttime nasal symptoms. In relation to the Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) guidelines, Almousa H et al. highlighted 82% of the clinicians preferred second generation oral antihistamines were considered safe which further supported the benefits of newer generation oral antihistamines.18

Current survey findings confirmed the benefits of combining an antihistamine with montelukast. This combined therapy effectively reduced symptoms and offers complementary and enhancing effects. Adsule and Misra demonstrated that when levocetirizine and montelukast were used together, they produce more favourable effects on AR symptoms and quality of life compared to using levocetirizine alone.5 Cingi et al. also indicated that for treating AR symptoms, the combination of fexofenadine and montelukast was more beneficial than using antihistamines alone.19 Literature review showed that there was a scarcity of studies comparing the montelukast-levocetirizine combination with the montelukast-fexofenadine combination in AR patients. In a randomised controlled trial conducted by Mahatme et al., it was found that although the decrease in Total Nasal Symptom Score was higher in the montelukast-fexofenadine group, the montelukast-levocetirizine combination was found to be more cost-effective. The current survey findings further validated these findings with the help of clinicians.20

These findings not only supported but also expanded upon previous research, demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of the leukotriene receptor antagonists and antihistamine combinations in the treatment of AR among Indian patients. The survey emphasized the clinical utility of such combinations in enhancing AR symptoms and the overall quality of life. The primary strengths of the study include a larger sample size of 435 specialists, the incorporation of expert opinions from knowledgeable allergy practitioners, and a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy of different antihistamine combinations. Moreover, the survey recognized the importance of tailoring therapeutic choices to individual patient characteristics to achieve the best possible treatment outcomes. It was also important to acknowledge the limitations of the survey. The utilization of self-reported data could have introduced response bias and recollection bias, potentially impacting the representativeness of the sample. Furthermore, the non-randomized design of the study limited the ability to establish causality. To gain a more comprehensive perspective, it was paramount to consider these findings in light of these associated limitations.

Conclusion

Experts recommended the combinations of levocetirizine + montelukast and fexofenadine + montelukast to manage AR patients experiencing symptoms such as a runny nose, itchy eyes, coughing, and nasal congestion. Levocetirizine and montelukast were preferred for treating nighttime nasal symptoms, while fexofenadine and montelukast were recommended for daytime nasal symptoms. Clinicians also endorsed the combination of levocetirizine and montelukast for relieving nasal congestion.

Source of funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank all the clinicians who were participated in this study.

References

1 

N Husna SM Tan M Ashari MD Shukri NS Wong Allergic rhinitis: A clinical and pathophysiological overviewFront Med20227874114

2 

RE Grubbe WR Lumry R Anolik Efficacy and safety of desloratadine/pseudoephedrine combination vs its components in seasonal allergic rhinitisJ Investig Allergol Clin Immunol200919211741

3 

SA Wiqar Allergic rhinitis in allergy and asthma-a clinical primerIJCP199914265

4 

H Phan ML Moeller MC Nahata Treatment of allergic rhinitis in infants and children: efficacy and safety of second-generation antihistamines and the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukastDrugs200969254176

5 

SM Adsule D Misra Long term treatment with montelukast and levocetirizine combination in persistent allergic rhinitis: review of recent evidenceJ Indian Med Assoc201010863813

6 

S Kaushik A Sachan R Awasthi S Vashistha To Evaluate the Role of levocetirizine monotherapy vs. levocetirizine and montelukast combination therapy in seasonal allergic rhinitisClin Rhinol201141239

7 

V Gupta PS Matreja Efficacy of montelukast and levocetirizine as treatment for allergic rhinitisJ Allergy Ther20101114

8 

M Ciebiada MG Ciebiada M Barylski T Kmiecik P Gorski Use of Montelukast Alone or in Combination with Desloratadine or Levocetirizine in Patients with Persistent Allergic RhinitisAm J Rhinol Allergy201125116

9 

D Press Montelukast in the management of allergic rhinitisTCRM20073232759

10 

A Shah R Pawankar Allergic rhinitis and co-morbid asthma: perspective from India -- ARIA Asia-Pacific Workshop reportAsian Pac J Allergy Immunol2009271718

11 

A Kumar Beenta Prescription Writing Trends of Antihistamines at the University Health CentreIndian J Pharm Sci200971330710

12 

MT Recto MT Gabriel Selecting optimal second-generation antihistamines for allergic rhinitis and urticaria in AsiaClin Mol Allergy201715119

13 

Y Xu J Zhang J Wang The Efficacy and Safety of Selective H1-Antihistamine versus Leukotriene Receptor Antagonist for Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis: A Meta-AnalysisPLOS ONE2014911112815

14 

G Liu X Zhou J Chen F Liu Oral Antihistamines Alone vs in Combination with Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists for Allergic Rhinitis: A Meta-analysisOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg201815834508

15 

M Ciebiada MG Ciebiada T Kmiecik LM Dubuske P Gorski Quality of life in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis treated with montelukast alone or in combination with levocetirizine or desloratadineJ Investig Allergol Clin Immunol200818534352

16 

M Ciebiada MG Ciebiada LM Dubuske P Górski Montelukast with desloratadine or levocetirizine for the treatment of persistent allergic rhinitisAsthma Immunol200697566471

17 

Wise International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis - 2023202313293859

18 

H Almousa SM Alsaad D Ismail S Mahjoub B Obaid S Alsaleh Allergic rhinitis guidelines knowledge, attitudes, and practices among primary health care physicians: A national multicentre cross-sectional studyJ Family Med Prim Care202312612028

19 

C Cingi K Gunhan LG White H Unlu Efficacy of leukotriene antagonists as concomitant therapy in allergic rhinitisThe Laryngoscope20101209171841

20 

MS Mahatme GN Dakhale K Tadke SK Hiware SD Dudhgaonkar S Wankhede Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of montelukast-levocetirizine and montelukast-fexofenadine in patients of allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind clinical trialIndian J Pharmacol201648664953



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

108-112


Authors Details

S Manjula, M Krishna Kumar


Article History

Received : 20-12-2023

Accepted : 11-01-2024


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files