Introduction
Management options for Chronic Otitis Media (Mucosal) are surgery, hearing aids or no treatment. The aim of middle ear surgery in cases of Chronic Otitis Media (COM) is to give a dry ear to the patient and reduce their hearing disability. Various surgical options available for COM (Mucosal) are Myringoplasty, Tympanoplasty with or without ossiculoplasty and with or without Cortical Mastoidectomy.1 Because of availability of these varied options which are guided by extent of disease, ossicular status, anatomical variations and presence or absence of complications, prior knowledge of the exact surgery which needs to be performed in a particular patient would help the Otologists in preoperative surgical planning.
Clinical examination of a case of COM can help in visualisation of the disease and ossicular status only to a limited extent, but imaging of temporal bone can help to obtain excellent preoperative visualisation of ossicular status, anatomical variations and extent of the disease and also assist in assessing any asymptomatic complications. Hence the role of imaging in planning the surgeries in cases of COM cannot be over emphasized.2, 3
Conventional imaging technique for COM is radiograph of mastoid (Schuller’s view), which gives very limited information. As the role of preoperative CT in COM (Squamous) is of immense importance and well established, it has been suggested that it could be extrapolated to COM (Mucosal) for evaluating the above mentioned pathological entities and anatomical variations, thereby allowing accurate pre-operative assessment and management planning of intraoperative steps.4, 5, 6, 7
High Resolution Computerised Tomography (HRCT) scan of the Temporal Bone provides excellent information but is associated with high level of radiation exposure. In the last few years an alternative has been found, namely Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), which, like HRCT is based on the application of X-Rays.8, 9 CBCT offers a good spatial resolution and detailed reconstruction with a significantly lower irradiation in comparison with HRCT and is being routinely used in for minor dental and medical conditions.2, 3, 10 CBCT is a latest upcoming technology where imaging is accomplished by using a rotating gantry to which an X-Ray source and detector are fixed. A divergent pyramidal or cone-shaped source of ionizing radiation is directed through the middle of the area of interest onto an X-Ray detector on the opposite side. The imaging can be done in supine, sitting or an erect posture. Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) of a CT scan of middle ear is around 170 mGy compared to 15-30 mGy for Cone Beam CT.11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 9, 16 Another advantage is that CBCT is very fast, usually taking between 9-18 seconds, and is available in an OPD setting, thus more convenient. Furthermore, it is an open device, so it can be done even in claustrophobic and anxious persons.2
The aim of this study was to determine any change in management plan of evaluated cases of COM (Mucosal) post CBCT as assessed by the treating ENT Surgeon. Our secondary objective was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the CBCT findings as compared to the intra operative findings in the study participants.
Materials and Methods
This was an observational descriptive study conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery of an academic tertiary care hospital from October 2017 to October 2019.
As ossicular erosion is the most important parameter in changing the management plan in cases of COM (Mucosal), the sample size was calculated on the basis of prevalence of ossicular erosion, which is reported to be around 13.9%.4 Assuming this prevalence, with 95% confidence interval and deviation of 5%, the sample size was calculated as 95. n = 1.96 x p x (1-p) ÷ (0.05).2
The clearance from Institutional Ethics Committee was obtained on 16 Nov 2017. All diagnosed cases of COM (Mucosal) of more than 16 years of age reporting to the ENT outpatient department and willing to participate were included in this study. Cases of COM Squamous disease, those with presence of overt complications of COM or cases requiring revision surgery for COM were excluded from this study.
The participants were counselled about their participation in the study and informed consent was taken. After detailed history taking, patients underwent complete systemic and ENT examination including otoscopic, otomicroscopic examination and audiological evaluation, and these formed the basis of a tentative management plan by an ENT surgeon with at least 10 years of experience in this Tertiary Care Hospital. This plan was recorded.
The patients then underwent CBCT Temporal Bone using New Tom CEFLA SC, SN 70820658 machine made in Imola (BO), Italy. The extent of disease, status of the ossicular chain, anatomical variations and presence of complications if any were studied. The CBCT findings were discussed with an experienced Radiologist and the management plan was then revised if needed and recorded.
Details of management plan before CBCT were compared with the plan after CBCT. The percentage of cases undergoing a change in the management after CBCT was determined. The nature of change in the management plan was also noted. The correlation of CBCT findings and intra operative findings in terms of specificity and sensitivity was statistically calculated using Mc Nemar’s test.
Table 2
Observation & Results
Our study evaluated patients with COM (Mucosal) and studied the utility of CBCT as a tool to assess change in management plan if any.
The study included 95 patients, out of which 60 (63.16%) were males and 35 (36.84%) were females. 47.4% of the patients had disease pathology in left ear and 52.6% had disease pathology in right ear. Majority of the patients were between 20 to 50 years of age corresponding to 86.3%.
Active disease with a history of otorrhea in the past 12 weeks was seen in 63.2% of the patients whereas 36.8% had inactive disease in the current study [Table 1]. Tympanoplasty in 32.6% patients and Cortical Mastoidectomy with Tympanoplasty in 67.4% of the patients.
Subsequent to imaging, the management plan was changed in only 4 patients with a total of 28.4% undergoing Tympanoplasty and rest 71.6% undergoing Tympanoplasty.with Cortical Mastoidectomy.
The change in management plan post imaging was however non-significant as determined by Mc Nemar’s test with a P value of 0.125 (more than >0.05 at 95% confidence interval) [Fig 1]. CBCT was performed in all the patients and its findings were corroborated with the intra-operative findings in order to detect sensitivity and specificity of CBCT. Intra-operative findings are gold standard and serve as the baseline to which imaging findings can be corroborated with.
Pneumatisation of Mastoid, anatomical variations like high jugular bulb, low-lying dura and ossicular erosions were evaluated with CBCT [Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5]. Mastoid was sclerosed in 71.6% of the patients, pneumatised in 28.4%, high jugular bulb was seen in 15.8%, low lying dura was seen in 14.7% and ossicular erosion was not seen in any of the patients as determined by CBCT in our study. All the findings were corroborated by intra-operative findings except for one patient with ossicular erosion. This gave a 100% sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for CBCT to detect pneumatisation of the Mastoid, high jugular bulb and low-lying dura. The sensitivity to detect ossicular erosion was 98.9% [Table 2]. These values suggest that all the findings of CBCT correlate with what is detected intra-operatively especially with regards to pneumatisation of Mastoid, high jugular bulb, low lying dura and ossicular erosions.Mastoidectomy is done along with Tympanoplasty as a management plan to treat COM (Mucosal) with a history of otorrhea in the past 12 weeks considering it to be an active disease corroborating it with the imaging findings. In our centre, generally, patients with active disease and sclerosed and poorly pneumatised Mastoids on X-Rays are taken up for Cortical Mastoidectomy and Tympanoplasty.17 Hence, on the basis of imaging findings, it was further decided that some of the patients would require Cortical Mastoidectomy and only Tympanoplasty would not suffice.18 When the jugular bulb reached or exceeded the level of the floor of Internal Acoustic Meatus, it was defined as a High Jugular bulb.19 In our study, we identified a high jugular bulb in 15 out of 95 cases accounting to 15.8 %. This finding helped us avoid any inadvertent injury to jugular bulb. Zhaohui L et al.20 noted low lying dura in 21.8% of the patients when they studied anatomic variations of Temporal Bone. Dura is said to be low-lying if it is below the level of the attic roof.21 Low lying dura can hamper disease clearance and can lead to inadvertant injury to dura. In our study low lying dura was seen in 14 out of 95 cases accounting to 14.7%.
Güldner C et al. evaluated anatomy in normal and pathologic middle ears using CBCT.10 They concluded in their study that CBCT imaging in diseases of the lateral skull base or Temporal Bone is very much similar to conventional CT. They also inferred that all the structures were clearly visible almost every time in both the groups. However, they noted that looking at the ossicular chain, smaller structures, like the head of the Stapes or the crura of the Stapes, showed significant limitations in clear identification. In our study, we identified ossicular erosion intraoperatively in only one case accounting to 1.1 %, which was missed on CBCT. Dahmani-Causse et al. compared techniques of Computed Tomography scans on evaluating Temporal Bone anatomic variations and pathologies and showed that CBCT provides effective morphological assessment of Temporal Bone due to better spatial resolution than Multislice Helical CT with a significantly lesser radiation dose.22
According to Raffery et al, CBCT radiation levels are just around 10% those of Multislice CT and 6 -10% according to Barker et al.23, 24 CBCT thus carries a lower risk of radiation exposure and further side effects of it to the individual getting exposed to it. Radiation exposures by CBCT are only 2-3 times higher than conventional X-Ray Temporal Bone with significantly more information provided.25
Considering a high sensitivity and specificity in identification of certain important parameters of Chronic Otitis Media and also to detect any variations in anatomical structures, CBCT can be considered as an ideal imaging technique in such patients.
Advantages
This study uses CBCT which has only minimal difference in the radiation exposure as compared to X-Ray mastoids but a vast difference as compared to HRCT Temporal Bone. The Computed Tomographic Dose Index (CTDI) of a CT scan of the middle ear is around 170 mGy and it is 15 - 30 mGy for CBCT.3
CBCT can be used in gathering information about the disease process and the effects of it as compared to X-Ray skull which gives only limited information in the form of extent of pneumatisation and approximate levels of the sinus and Dural plates.
CBCT machines are compact and it can be installed in an OPD setting and even operating room assistants can be trained in operating them.
Limitations
The study did not compare the findings of CBCT with other conventional diagnostic imaging such as CT, MSCT scans to arrive at comparative figures.
Small inner ear structures and other pathologies such as labyrinthine fistula, Dural erosions, etc. were not evaluated and may have their own limitations in accurately visualizing them.
Conclusion
This study showed a high utility of CBCT in deriving useful information from the patients of Chronic Otitis Media and its benefit of less radiation exposure as compared to conventional CT. CBCT has a high specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in detecting pneumatisation of Mastoid, high Jugular bulb, low lying dura and ossicular erosions when corroborated with intra-operative findings. Though thorough clinical examination remains the gold standard in making a management plan of patients with Chronic Otitis Media (Mucosal), CBCT with its available details and minimal radiation helped to minimise intraoperative inadvertent injuries which might have resulted due to normal anatomic variations like low lying dura, forward lying sinus, contracted mastoid cavity etc. Its use can also be extended for follow up of cochlear implantees as it has low sensitivity to artefacts and it may replace the conventional X-Ray skull in future.26